From the Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships, Vol. VII
(1981), pp. 569-731.
TANK LANDING SHIPS (LST)
The British evacuation from
Dunkirk in 1940 demonstrated to the Admiralty that the Allies needed relatively
large, ocean-going ships capable of shore
-to-shore delivery of tanks and
other vehicles in amphibious assaults upon the continent of Europe. As an
interim measure, three medium-sized tankers, built to pass over the restrictive
bars of Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela, were selected for conversion becau
se
of their shallow draft. Bow doors and ramps were added to these ships which
became the first tank landing ships (LST's). They later proved their worth
during the invasion of Algeria in 1942, but their bluff bows made for inadequate
speed and pointed up
the need for an all-new design incorporating a sleeker
hull.
At their first meeting at the Argentia Conference in August 1941, President
Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill confirmed the Admiralty's views.
In November 1941, a small delega
tion from the Admiralty arrived in the United
States to pool ideas with the Navy's Bureau of Ships with regard to development
of the required ship. During this meeting, it was decided that the Bureau
of Ships would design these vessels.
Withi
n a few days, John Niedermair of the Bureau of Ships sketched out
an awkwardlooking ship that proved to be the basic design for the more than
1,000 LST's which would be built during World War II. To meet the conflicting
requirements of deep draft for ocea
n travel and shallow draft for beaching,
the ship was designed with a large ballast system that could be filled for
ocean passage and pumped out for beaching operations. The rough sketch was
sent to Britain on 5 November 1941 and accepted immediately. The
Admiralty
then requested the United States to build 200 LST's for the Royal Navy under
the terms of lend-lease.
The preliminary plans initially called for an LST 280 feet in length;
but, in January 1942, the Bureau of Ships discarded these d
rawings in favor
of specifications for a ship 290 feet long. Within a month, final working
plans were developed which further stretched the overall length to 328 feet
and called for a 50-foot beam and minimum draft of three feet 9 l/2 inches.
This scheme
distributed the ship's weight over a greater area enabling her
to ride higher in the water when in landing trim. The LST could carry a
2,100-ton load of tanks and vehicles. The larger dimensions also permitted
the designers to increase the width of the bo
w door opening and ramp from
12 to 14 feet and thus accommodate most Allied vehicles. Provisions were
made for the satisfactory ventilation of the tank space while the tank motors
were running, and an elevator was provided to lower vehicles from the maind
eck to the tank deck for disembarking. By January 1942, the first scale
model of the LST had been built and was undergoing tests at the David Taylor
Model Basin in Washington, D.C.
In three separate acts dated 6 February 1942, 26 May 1943, an
d 17 December
1943, Congress provided the authority for the construction of LST's along
with a host of other auxiliaries, destroyer escorts, and assorted landing
craft. The enormous building program quickly gathered momentum. Such a high
priority was assi
gned to the construction of LST's that the keel of an aircraft
carrier, previously laid in the dock, was hastily removed to make place
for several LST's to be built in her stead. The keel of the first LST was
laid down on 10 June 1942 at Newport News, Va.
; and the first standardized
LST's were floated out of their building dock in October. Twenty-three were
in commission by the end of 1942.
The LST building program was unique in several respects. As soon as
the basic design had been developed
, contracts were let and construction
was commenced in quantity before the completion of a test vessel. Preliminary
orders were rushed out verbally or by telegrams, telephone, and air mail
letters. The ordering of certain materials actually preceded the c
ompletion
of design work. While many heavy equipment items such as main propulsion
machinery were furnished directly by the Navy, the balance of the procurement
was handled centrally by the Material Coordinating Agency -- an adjunct
of the Bureau of Ships
-- so that the numerous builders in the program would
not have to bid against one another. Through vigorous follow-up action on
materials ordered, the agency made possible the completion of construction
schedules in record time.
The need for
LST's was urgent, and the program enjoyed a high priority
throughout the war. Since most shipbuilding activities were located in coastal
yards and were largely used for construction of large, deep-draft ships,
new construction facilities were established
along inland waterways. In
some instances, heavyindustry plants such as steel fabrication yards were
converted for LST construction. This posed the problem of getting the completed
ships from the inland building yards to deep water. The chief obstacles
w
ere bridges. The Navy successfully undertook the modification of bridges
and, through a "Ferry Command" of Navy crews, transported the
newly constructed ships to coastal ports for fitting out. The success of
these "cornfield" shipyards
of the Middle West was a revelation
to the long-established shipbuilders on the coasts. Their contribution to
the LST building program was enormous. Of the 1,051 LST's built during World
War II, 670 were constructed by five major inland builders.
By 1943, the construction time for an LST had been reduced to four months;
and, by the end of the war, it had been cut to two months. Considerable
effort was expended to hold the ship's design constant; but, by mid-1943,
operating experience led to
the incorporation of certain changes in the
new ships. These modifications included: the replacing of the elevator by
a ramp from the main deck to the tank deck, an increase in armament, and
the addition of a distilling plant to make potable water. The ma
in deck
was strengthened to accommodate a fully-equipped landing craft, tank (LCT).
From their combat debut in the Solomons in June 1943 until the end of
the hostilities in August 1945, the LST's performed a vital service in World
War II. The
y participated in the invasions of Sicily, Italy, Normandy, and
southern France in the European Theater and were an essential element in
the island-hopping campaigns in the Pacific which culminated in the liberation
of the Philippines and the capture of I
wo Jima and Okinawa.
The LST proved to be a remarkably versatile ship. A number of them were
converted to become landing craft repair ships (ARL). In this design, the
bow ramp and doors were removed, and the bow was sealed. Derricks, booms,
a
nd winches were added to haul damaged landing craft on board for repairs,
and blacksmith, machine, and electrical workshops were provided on the main
deck and tank deck.
Another successful conversion was the LST "Mother Ship." Thisv
ersion of the standard LST hull had two Quonset huts erected on the main
deck to accommodate 40 officers. Bunks on the tank deck berthed an additional
196 men. A bake shop and 16 refrigeration boxes for fresh provisions augmented
the facilities normally p
rovided the crew. Four extra distilling units were
added, and the ballast tanks were converted for storage of fresh water.
Thirty-eight LST's were converted to serve as small hospital ships.
They supplemented the many standard LST's which rem
oved casualties from
the beach following the landing of their cargo of tanks and vehicles. For
example, on D day, LST's brought 41,035 wounded men back across the English
Channel from the Normandy beaches. Other LST's, provided with extra cranes
and handl
ing gear, were used exclusively for replenishing ammunition. They
possessed a special advantage in this role, as their size permitted two
or three LST's to go simultaneously alongside an anchored battleship or
cruiser to accomplish replenishment more rapi
dly than standard ammunition
ships. In the latter stages of World War II, some LST's were even fitted
with flight decks from which small observation planes were sent up during
amphibious operations.
Throughout the war, LST's demonstrated a re
markable capacity to absorb
punishment and survive. Despite the sobriquet, "Large Slow Target,"
which was applied to them by irreverent crew members, the LST's suffered
few losses in proportion to their number and the scope of their operations.T
heir brilliantly conceived structural arrangement provided unusual strength
and buoyancy. Although the LST was considered a valuable target by the enemy,
only 26 were lost due to enemy action, and a mere 13 were the victims of
weather, reef, or accident.<
BR>
A total of 1,152 LST's were contracted for in the great naval
building program of World War II, but 101 were cancelled in the fall of
1942 because of shifting construction priorities. 0f 1,051 actually constructed,
113 LST's were trans
ferred to Great Britain under the terms of lend-lease,
and four more were turned over to the Greek Navy. Conversions to other ship
types with different hull designations accounted for 116.
The end of World War II left the Navy with a huge inv
entory of amphibious
ships. Hundreds of these were scrapped or sunk, and most of the remaining
ships were put in "mothballs" to be preserved for the future.
Consequently, construction of LST's in the immediate post-war years was
modest. LST-
1153 and LST-115I, commissioned respectively
in 1947 and 1949, were the only steam-driven LST's ever built by the Navy.
They provided improved berthing arrangements and a greater cargo capacity
than their predecessors.
The success
of the amphibious assault at Inchon during the Korean War
pointed up the utility of LST's once again. This was in contrast with the
earlier opinion expressed by many military authorities that the advent of
the atomic bomb had relegated amphibious landings
to a thing of the past.
As a consequence, 15 LST's of what were later to be known as the Terrebonne
Parish-class were constructed in the early 1950's. These new LST's were
56 feet longer and were equipped with four, rather than two, diesel engines
,
which increased their speed to 15 knots. Three-inch 50-caliber twin mounts
replaced the old twin 40-millimeter guns, and controllable pitch propellers
improved the ship's backing power. On 1 July 1955, county or parish names
(Louisiana counties are call
ed "parishes") were assigned to LST's,
which previously had borne only a letter-number hull designation.
In the late 1950's, seven additional LST's of the De Soto County-class
were constructed. These were an improved version
over earlier LST's,
with a high degree of habitability for the crew and embarked troops. Considered
the "ultimate" design attainable with the traditional LST bow
door configuration, they were capable of 17.5 knots.
The commissioning
of Newport (LST-1179) in 1969 marked the introduction
of an entirely new concept in the design of LST's. She was the first of
a new class of 20 LST's capable of steaming at a sustained speed of 20 knots.
To obtain that speed, the traditional blunt
bow doors of the LST were replaced
by a pointed ship bow. Unloading is accomplished through the use of a 112-foot
ramp operated over the bow and supported by twin derrick arms. A stern gate
to the tank deck permits unloading of amphibious tractors into t
he water
or the unloading of other vehicles into a landing craft, utility (LCU) or
onto a pier. Capable of operating with today's high speed amphibious squadrons
consisting of LHA's, LPD's, and LSD's, the Newport-class LST can
transport tanks, othe
r heavy vehicles, and engineer equipment which cannot
readily be landed by helicopters or landing craft. Thus, the utility of
the LST seems to be assured far into the future.
Here are individual command
histories of U.S. Tank Landing Ships:
LST-1 to LST-50
LST-51 to LST-84
LST-86 through LST-116 cancelled 16 September 1942
LST-117 to LST-150
LST-151 to
LST-200
LST-201 to LST-250
LST-251 to LST-300
LST-301 to
LST-350
LST-351 to LST-400
LST-401 to LST-450
LST-451 to
LST-500
LST-501 to LST-550
LST-551 to LST-600 |
LST-601 to LST-650
LST-651 to
LST-700
LST-701 to LST-750
LST-751 to LST-800
LST-801 to
LST-850
LST-851 to LST-900
LST-901 to LST-950
LST-951 to
LST-1000
LST-1001 to LST-1050
LST-1051 to LST-1100
LST-1101 to
LST-1150
LST-1151 to LST-1198 |